Showing posts with label Adam Driver. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Adam Driver. Show all posts

10 September 2023

STAR WARS: THE LAST JEDI (2017, Rian Johnson)

 

Star Wars: The Last Jedi

* * * 

The First Order is being well out of order and the Resistance is trying to resist them, with reclusive former Jedi Luke Skywalker training youngster Rey in the Force.

Starring  Daisy Ridley, John Boyega, Adam Driver, Oscar Isaac, Mark Hamill, Domhnall Gleeson

Written by  Rian Johnson

Produced by  Kathleen Kennedy, Ram Bergman

Duration  152 minutes






Released in October 2012, the official Disney announcement about the Mouse House’s acquisition of Lucasfilm includes the following line from George himself: "It’s now time for me to pass STAR WARS on to a new generation of filmmakers." Elsewhere in the statement, Bob Iger, Disney’s chairman/CEO, says of Lucas, "He’s entertained, inspired, and defined filmmaking for almost four decades and we’re incredibly honoured that he has entrusted the future of that legacy to Disney."

Lucas wanted to give up his baby; he’d watched it grow up and had decided that it no longer needed him. He was still hurting from all the (deserved) criticism his prequel trilogy had received from fans who thought they knew better, and so this man who was clearly uncomfortable in the role of director – six films across 30 years with none between 1983 and 1999 or since 2005 – finally cashed out and took his winnings home.

But he didn’t leave without (a new) hope. Clearly, George had not stopped caring about wars among the stars: the press release vaguely promises that he will carry on "as creative consultant" to Kathleen Kennedy, which may or may not have actually happened. And there is no doubt that he wanted the franchise to be carried forward by the right people, filmmakers who could "entertain, inspire and define", as Iger – or, more likely, Iger’s PA – had put it.


Daisy Ridley and Mark Hamill in Star Wars: The Last Jedi


And it really seemed like Kennedy was on the same page, judging by the talent she was lining up to fill George’s boots. But then the following happened:

– TOY STORY 3 writer Michael Arndt is fired from EPISODE VII.

– Gareth Edwards directs ROGUE ONE but is fired during post-production.

– Phil Lord and Chris Miller are hired to direct SOLO but are fired during production and replaced by Ron Howard, who reshoots most of the film.

– JURASSIC WORLD’s Colin Trevorrow is brought in to helm EPISODE IX but is fired and replaced by JJ Abrams.

– CHRONICLE’s Josh Trank is hired to direct a Boba Fett movie with a release target of 2018 but is fired before production begins. He’s replaced by LOGAN’s James Mangold, but the film still hasn’t been made.

And thats not even a comprehensive list.

And what of THE LAST JEDI director Rian Johnson? The BRICK, LOOPER and, latterly, KNIVES OUT man was the biggest auteur of the lot and had been entrusted to helm a whole new trilogy. But audience backlash to the risks he took with LAST JEDI (you know, the kind of risks that filmmakers who can entertain, inspire and define the artform tend to take) spooked Disney and word on parts two and three went quiet. And Johnson's fanbase-dividing decisions were then all reversed in the next episode.

My own reaction to the post-Lucas Skywalker trilogy, as someone who doesn’t really care about STAR WARS but who will go see a new instalment since they're such cultural events, was that I understood why Disney had gone so safe with THE FORCE AWAKENS. Sixteen years on from REVENGE OF THE SITH (the only watchable entry in the prequel trilogy), they needed to get the fans back onside with an onslaught of nostalgia and I thought Abrams pulled if off commendably.

Then THE LAST JEDI tried to do something different while still managing to be entertaining and yes, I did resent how Disney then abandoned Johnson’s refreshing anti-family-legacy direction for THE RISE OF SKYWALKER – especially because that time the ‘safety first’ approach really backfired. Oh my sweet Lord. SKYWALKER was just awful: boring, derivative and lacking any kind of energy or inspiration, with an incredibly lazy plot-point-to-plot-point ‘OK, we’ve got that thing, we may as well head off now to get the next thing’ narrative. There hasn't been a STAR WARS movie since and God only knows how they are going to recover from that travesty. 


Kellie Marie Tran and John Boyega in Star Wars: The Last Jedi


Meanwhile, my second viewing of middle-entry LAST JEDI for this review did little to alter my earlier impressions:

– It still has Domhnall Gleeson channelling Peter Cushing, alongside Eddie Hitler from Bottom.

– Ford is still gone, but Hammill is back (making brave character decisions while living off green milk straight from a sea mammal’s teat) and Fisher remains with us, for now.

– Laura Dern still turns up to work with a purple rinse, clearly modelled after Phyllis Pearce from Coronation Street.

– It still doesn't make sense that Kylo Ren would have his hair that long if he's going to sweat inside a helmet all day. Go for the number one all over, mate!

– It still has the courage to be STAR WARS while also being about STAR WARS, and its fans, with a candidness that made some of those fans uncomfortable.

– It's still the most political entry in this space opera by a large margin, as is typical of Johnson, which was another thing that antagonised some.

– It still manages to mostly make you forget that the reason it exists is to sell toys.

– And it's still probably the best one of these things since THE EMPIRE STRIKES BACK.

And so how does the future look for STAR WARS movies? Will Kennedy et al stop being so trigger-happy and let writers and directors follow through with progressive ideas that won’t please everyone but which may be the only way to keep this saga of all sagas alive?

Only time will tell. All I’ll say is, I hope that right at this moment George is enjoying his billions and that they are providing great comfort. 

Three stars out of five.


Valid use of the word ‘last’?  These things never end; there will always be more. There will always be more and you will always come to see them.

What would a movie called THE FIRST JEDI be about?
 "According to the Legends universe, the first Jedi ever was Prime Jedi, who founded the Jedi Order around 25,000 BBY (before the Battle of Yavin) on the planet of Anch-To." So now you know.


Previously:  LAST KNIGHTS

Next time:
  THE LAST FIVE YEARS


Check out my books:  Jonathanlastauthor.com

12 April 2023

THE LAST DUEL (2021, Ridley Scott)

 * * * 

Two knights fight to the death after the wife of one accuses the other of rape; we're shown three different perspectives of what happened.

Starring  
Matt Damon, Adam Driver, Jodie Comer, Ben Affleck 

Written by  Nicole Holofcener, Ben Affleck, Matt Damon

Produced by  Ridley Scott, Kevin J Walsh, Jennifer Fox, Nicole Holofcener, Matt Damon, Ben Affleck

Duration  152 minutes







Ridley does RASHOMON ...

Look, I’m just going to come out and say it: Ridley Scott is the most overrated director in the history of motion pictures.

So the three that everyone goes on about are:

– ALIEN: A great film, obviously, but I like it less each time someone erroneously tells me that it’s superior to ALIENS.

– 
BLADE RUNNER: But, but … it looks so nice! Oh, wow, yes it looks nice. And it has
atmosphere! Mmm, atmosphere, right. Beyond that … not much to latch onto really, especially considering the source material is one of Philip K Dick’s very best.

– 
GLADIATOR: I remember thinking that this Russell Crowe from LA CONFIDENTIAL and THE INSIDER is now a proper movie star. Never for a moment did I imagine that the film itself, a fun but insubstantial swords-and-sandals romp, would be nominated for a Best Picture Oscar, let alone win the bloody thing.

The rest of Scott's films fall into one of the following categories:

– Intriguing premises that don't turn into engaging films: ALL THE MONEY IN THE WORLD, HOUSE OF GUCCI, ROBIN HOOD.

– 
Dull and pretentious:
 HANNIBAL, THE DUELLISTS, PROMETHEUS, ALIEN: COVENANT.

– 
Fun genre exercises, minus the fun: LEGEND, BLACK RAIN, BODY OF LIES, THE COUNSELLOR.

– 
Boring ‘epics’:
 EXODUS: GODS AND KINGS, KINGDOM OF HEAVEN, 1492: CONQUEST OF PARADISE.

– 
Totally forgettable and now totally forgotten:
 WHITE SQUALL, GI JANE, A GOOD YEAR, AMERICAN GANGSTER, SOMEONE TO WATCH OVER ME.




To be fair, you can’t go wrong with THELMA & LOUISE, although that succeeds due to the strength of the screenplay and performances; ditto MATCHSTICK MEN. And even I can't deny that BLACK HAWK DOWN is a top-notch modern warfare flick. And THE MARTIAN is OK.

But overall, the scales are heavily tilted in one direction. The main problem is that Scott clearly doesn’t care much about the screenplays that land on his desk, beyond their aesthetic possibilities and figuring out how he's gonna move the people on screen from one flashy sequence to the next. It’s like he’s been given a script written in a language that he doesn’t speak and just goes through the pages shooting it anyway. Maybe it’s a former ad director thing: David Fincher has said that he’s not interested in what's being said, only the images, and that the words could be anything.

So alright then, what about THE LAST DUEL?

Well … it’s good! I mean, by Ridley’s standards anyway. I wasn’t sure about Adam Driver as an irresistible ladies’ man and Matt Damon lets his beard do most of the acting. But Ben Affleck is fun, dropping C-bombs in a crowd-pleasing performance reminiscent of his enjoyably vainglorious turn in SHAKESPEARE IN LOVE. Jodie Comer rounds out the cast with a sensitive and engrossing turn, eclipsing her bigger-name co-stars.





The GOOD WILL HUNTING buddies collaborated on the script with Nicole Holofcener, each tackling one third of its same-event-from-a-different-perspective structure. And since he makes this one of the rare occasions where he prioritises the writing, rather than lingering on big impressive sets or sword-flinging battles while forgetting about tiny elements like ‘drama’ and ‘narrative’, Ridders manages to deliver something that holds the attention for its whole two-and-a-half-hours
.

I was particularly impressed at how the movie touches upon contemporary questions about consent, gender equality and male entitlement without being anachronistic or overly political. I guess you could say that it completes Sir Ridley’s feminist trilogy, after THELMA & LOUISE and GI JANE.

Not bad for an 84-year-old codger from South Shields. Still a pity about the batting average, though

Three stars out of five.


Valid use of the word ‘last’?  The whole thing is based on a true story, and the duel in question was apparently the last officially recognised one in France, so good job on the old historical accuracy, everyone. Maybe more came later in other countries, but I guess there isn’t an IMDb for duels, so who knows. (Also: who cares.)

What would a movie called THE FIRST DUEL be about?
 These little tiffs tended to be over ‘matters of honour’, so it would probably just be two blokes squabbling because one copied the other’s chainmail pattern or something. Calling Sir Ridders, we need your tedious touch! 


Previously:  THE LAST AIRBENDER

Next time:
  PUSS IN BOOTS: THE LAST WISH


Check out my books:  Jonathanlastauthor.com